Q1. 其實如果approach用auto pilot(raw data) 同managed兩個有咩優勢? 咁講la~ 我地用manage 之前,要明白隻機做緊咩。 其實selected同manage個profile都應該一樣,Follow同一個approach profile. 用Fully Managed就可以減少d pilot workload, situation awareness會好d(多d brainpower, 尤其是有failure) 但當個FMS profile有咩問題,開始deviate, 我地都要知點飛selected. 有d舊ge FM有bug. 所以只可以當To waypoint 係 final descent point先可以arm approach~ 所以before final descent point都係selected. 講得好d深!唔明要問~
Q.2不如講下cost index?



Cost index 係airline用嚟計 班機要飛快d 慳d 時間,俾小d 人工; 定飛慢d, 慳d 油.
咁佢地decide 左之後就會係FLT PLN 度.
而呢個number 對我地pilot 黎講唔代表d咩~
只係有個rough idea (CI 高就cruise 快d;CI 低就cruise 慢d)

好似上圖 CI10; pilot就要入CI10 落個FMS 度
(如下圖) 而FMS就會base on 個CI 去compute 個profile. (speed/ vertical profile/TOC/TOD...)

Q.3 如果OP descent + speed Manage(未有speed constrain嘅情況下) Airbus 會aim 咩speed pefer 用OP descent 定Manage定V/S幾時會用邊一個?
Manage speed 會follow FMGES (FMS) 個speed.(Depends on Cost Index)

Manage descent 會respect 埋d constrain.跟住個profile去!
但係OPEN DESCENT 係fixed thrust (IDLE) , 會maintain idle until ALT.
OP descent/manage descent/ VS 就睇情況. 如果check 哂所有constrain 都ok;就manage la~小d workload
但係有traffic ge 時侯會用VS去slow descent; 因為衝落去都無用又徙油~stay high~
Hi, I'd like to know more about how Vx, Vy change with altitudes.
For Vx IAS, by illustrating “thrust available Vs thrust required curve” I understand it increases with altitude because thrust available shifts downward whereas thrust required shift right, that means airspeed increases in order to achieve maximum excess thrust. But this is 'How" only, but why shift in that way? I still couldn't get it in terms of physics.
The same for Vy. Hope someone might help, cheers.
That's fine~ No dumb questions here~
On ground I don't think if it has can particular sound to identify it~ Except over the run-up area, you might see some aircraft doing the propeller check and that sound funny~ In general, one of the pros of having variable pitch prop is a bit quieter.
You can consider that as a gear box; when you are on fine pitch, you are on the 1st gear. As you go faster, you might wanna shift gear to 2nd or 3rd by reducing the RPM.
But before you reduce the RPM, Reduce the Manifold pressure First. When increase Power; Increase the RPM First. Unload the prop~
You don't want to over-stress the Engine or Prop.
I would suggest fly with the manual numbers first; then, play with it~
Always take care of your aircraft, keep an eye on the engine's parameters.
Safe Flight Always~
唔好意思只識飛 fixed pitch 的我想問一條白痴問題....
我想問下 variable pitch 的機無得聽聲
控制 Manifold pressure 同 Prop RPM
係咪只能夠跟住手冊入面 flight phase 所寫的數字去 set?
除此之外有無其他的 rules of thumb 令到自己更易知道係 set 岩?
ps: 平日多數會 set 比本 manual 高少少的 RPM 去換航速
如果係 variable pitch 的話都係要加大個 RPM 定係同時 MP 都要提升?
@ATVpilot Have another question about propeller twisting force, one is called the aerodynamic twisting moment (ATM), another one is the centrifugal twisting moment (CTM). I heard ATM drive the propeller to a coarse pitch and CTM drive the propeller to a fine pitch. Why is that happen and how they affect the propeller in-flight?
I think ATM is the dominant force of a single engine aircraft variable pitch propeller and CTM is the dominant force on the propellers of the multiengine aircraft.
It is because single engine aircraft's propeller tend to stop the rotation in a fine pitch after engine shutdown to facilitate the next engine start up and multiengine aircraft's propeller tend to stop at a coarse pitch after engine shutdown to reduce the drag in case of single engine failure inflight/ during takeoff.
@Dream to fly Very very nice explaination! I agree on most of them. In the case of static port blockage in an old aircraft, I would not break the altimeter; I would break the glass of VSI instead. (coz after the breaking of the glass, the indicator might not fuction properly. ) I would rather have altitude reading then VSI. Besides that, i agreed on the rest of your idea! Good job!
另外一個問題關於airspeed unreliable架,如果三支pitot tubes都fail曬~想問下Airbus係咪會有個AOA info係pfd個speed tape到話俾pilot知唔好飛出個margin?ATR有無類似嘅system架?
如果係個個情況之下,ND/FMS會唔會有GPS calculate嘅ground speed俾pilot做參考?因為細飛機如果pitot tube咁好彩唔塞左,除左attitude + power = performance有時可以cheating睇GPS個GS同wind大概估到自己嘅
TAS,唔知道大飛機有無得咁cheat呢? ^_^
通常我地用FD bar 去follow FMS ge pitch and rolls command.
either Manage NAV/CLB or HDG/OP CLB(or V/S) 都係用FD.
而FPA 通常會喺Non-precision approach ge 時候可能用到~
e.g. 如果VOR app 我選擇用manage NAV (lateral); selected(vertical)
咁我會用FPA 去做descent~因為FPA 可以maintain 個descent angle regardless of wind; 佢會correct左~
Alternate 會唔會fail FD bar? 咁要睇你壞咩 而alternate; 無記錯ge話, A330 ge alternate都有FD bar; Direct law 好似無FD
但係無FD 都可以用 TRK/FPA (BIRD)
想問下FPV同FD嘅分別同用途有咩唔同?係咩時候會用FPV?同埋FD會唔會係Alternate/Direct Law嘅情況之下fail架?thank you!!!