There has been an advice that we should never turn into the dead engine due to control difficulty and this is probably most instructors will say. But some of the twin pilots said it was only for old twins as the new one are fine as long as it is above Vmca. What is your opinion about that?
Perhaps its because of the design of the aircraft is different? Maybe there would be different effects on low speed on different kind of wings (perhaps the new design reduces the drag when that side of the engine failed, causing the yaw would be less significant)
@Gary Law@DrunkGood point! As @Gary Law mentioned, some instructor would say, "NEVER turn into the dead engine due to control difficulty." Lets look into this. What is the worst situation for handling in Engine Failure?
1) Power setting: As we discuss before, as engine fail, there will be a yawing moment (regardless if that is critical or not) As the operating engine running at its max power ; and the yawing moment will be the most significant. (More power on the live engine; more performance but also need more force to counteract the yawing moment. )
2) Low speed: At low speed, less airflow over the airfoil and the flight control is not as effective, compare to high speed. So the flight control might not have enough authority to counteract the engine yawing force under Vmc. And thats the concept of VMC.
that's why the handling quality is not as good when flying close to Vmca; and you dont want to risk that. ( might not have enough altitude to recover)As we discuss, you shall have more understanding, and turning into dead engine is do-able, only if the handling quality assured. ( Above Vmca)-give yourself some margin (couple kt above the Vmca and turn gently)
For the second question, whats the different in 'Old' and 'New' aircraft?
the concern here is the yawing force; so as we discuss before, the Newer aircraft generally have a better design of Counter-rotating propeller(CRP). By having CRP, it eliminate the issues with critical engine. As the thrust line is closer, the moment arm will be shorter and yawing force will not be as significant comparing to those 'Old' conventional aircraft. -side note: ATR is conventional. therefore, ATR does have critical engine like other conventional design.
@DrunkAs aforementioned, the ATR has critical engine; and good that the ATR has ATPCS to aid the pilot, by autofeather the failed propeller to minimize drag.-sidenote. When practicing V1 cut on the ATR, we need to put full rudder to compensate the yawing force.
Is there any critical engine on a Jet? Would torque also affect the operation performance of Jet engine? Would other aircaft systems, e.g. hydralics, eletrical, bleed, etc be considered when determining a critical engine of an aicraft? Or it is mostly focus on the propeller effect? Sorry for late question~~
@Dreamer From my understanding, #1 and #4 engines are critical. As you said, they both have the longer Arm and more yawing moment compare to #2 and #3.
But I would assume the yawing moment wont be as significant as the Twin jets, or easier to manage. As the inner engine is still producing thrust and they might have the luxury to reduce the thrust on the operating side to minimize yawing moment. (depends on performance)
I talked to some 747 pilots before; they said IFSD is not a problem for them; if performance and fuel is permitted; they dont need to divert. They can continue the flight to the destination.
Before I explain, u need to understand where the bleed come from. The bleed comes from the high pressure compressor (it is simiply stealing energy from the engine)So by shutting them off, reserve all power within the engine. IFSD In flight shut down
BTW, I dont understand why both the left and right engine rotate clockwise (if one of the engine rotate anticlockwise, the effect would be equal theoretically, is it because of fuel consumption?)
On the counter rotating prop aircraft, It dramatically enhanced the aircraft handling during engine out. However, since the aircraft needs 2 different set of engines and prop, usually cost more for Maintenance . (Compared to conventional, same part can serve either side of the engine)
In normal conditions in a dual engine aircraft, assuming both engine rotate clockwise, the descending blade (left side of the engine) in the engine propeller generate more thrust than the ascending blade on each engine (right side of the engine). If the left engine failed, since the asymmetrical thrust let the airplane yaw to the left, and more drag is produced on the left side on the wing, pilot have to input more rudder and aileron control towards the right to maintain the centerline. However, if the right engine failed, since the aerodynamic effect on the left engine is less than right engine, the yaw should be less significant than the right engine, which makes the left engine a critical engine (need more input on control surface).
In a crosswind condition, as the figure shows, the wind blowing from the left. It makes the pilot have to do more rudder and aileron input on the left side. If the left engine is out, the asymmetrical thrust makes compensate towards the wind, and less input is required. However if the right engine quit, the asymmetrical thrust makes airplane yaw to the left, the drag from the right and the wind makes airplane slipping towards the right, and pilot need a lot of control surface correction to maintain on the centerline. Therefore, the right engine would be the critical engine in this condition.
(I have no experience in flying and now trying to learn the "P factor". Please correct me if I am wrong.)
As you can see from the note I sent, ‘the descending blade of each prop produces more thrust than the ascending blade.‘ so on the conventional design(both prop rotate clockwise),the thrust line of the left engine is closer to the fuselage, compare to the right engine. Therefor, if left engine fails, it would have a bigger turning moment; (most adverse conditions) thus, left engine is the critical engine. that’s only explained about P-factor.
please have a look on that picture! Let me know about bout your thot~
There has been an advice that we should never turn into the dead engine due to control difficulty and this is probably most instructors will say. But some of the twin pilots said it was only for old twins as the new one are fine as long as it is above Vmca. What is your opinion about that?
Is there any critical engine on a Jet? Would torque also affect the operation performance of Jet engine? Would other aircaft systems, e.g. hydralics, eletrical, bleed, etc be considered when determining a critical engine of an aicraft? Or it is mostly focus on the propeller effect? Sorry for late question~~
BTW, I dont understand why both the left and right engine rotate clockwise (if one of the engine rotate anticlockwise, the effect would be equal theoretically, is it because of fuel consumption?)
In normal conditions in a dual engine aircraft, assuming both engine rotate clockwise, the descending blade (left side of the engine) in the engine propeller generate more thrust than the ascending blade on each engine (right side of the engine). If the left engine failed, since the asymmetrical thrust let the airplane yaw to the left, and more drag is produced on the left side on the wing, pilot have to input more rudder and aileron control towards the right to maintain the centerline. However, if the right engine failed, since the aerodynamic effect on the left engine is less than right engine, the yaw should be less significant than the right engine, which makes the left engine a critical engine (need more input on control surface).
In a crosswind condition, as the figure shows, the wind blowing from the left. It makes the pilot have to do more rudder and aileron input on the left side. If the left engine is out, the asymmetrical thrust makes compensate towards the wind, and less input is required. However if the right engine quit, the asymmetrical thrust makes airplane yaw to the left, the drag from the right and the wind makes airplane slipping towards the right, and pilot need a lot of control surface correction to maintain on the centerline. Therefore, the right engine would be the critical engine in this condition.
(I have no experience in flying and now trying to learn the "P factor". Please correct me if I am wrong.)